Table of Contents  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 57

Outcome of nonfusion spine surgery: Where we are?

1 Department of Spine Surgery, Dr L H Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication18-Dec-2017

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Pradeep K Singh
Dr L H Hiranandani Hospital, Powai, Mumbai - 400 076, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/joas.joas_54_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh PK, Khan SM. Outcome of nonfusion spine surgery: Where we are?. J Orthop Allied Sci 2017;5:57

How to cite this URL:
Singh PK, Khan SM. Outcome of nonfusion spine surgery: Where we are?. J Orthop Allied Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 23];5:57. Available from:

Nonfusion spine surgery is increasingly becoming popular with multiple advances in optics and imaging technology in terms of surgical technique, equipment, and outcome. Improved surgical methods have raised expectations of both patients and surgeons. Nonfusion surgeries of the spine predominantly refer not only to minimally invasive surgery but also to different percutaneous procedures. Nonfusion surgery is currently getting popular and generally relevant to the lumbar spine. However, there is currently no evidence that nonfusion implants are superior to fusion in mid- to long-term follow-up, and it is very imperative to understand the potential risks and benefits of nonfusion technology is essential for spine surgeons and their patients.[1] Any newer techniques in its initially phase always been critically analyzed for its long-term outcome and results. Hence, the results that the value of nonfusion surgeries are still debated. It would be relevant to conduct researches based on the outcome and adequacy of the treatment.

There has been very sparse literature on the outcome of nonfusion surgeries, and nothing has been observed about adequacy which refers to the ability to identify the type of patient who may really get benefit from a given treatment. Then, how should the result of a surgical intervention be measured? Fundamentally, the outcome can be quantified based on some subjective and others objective, and both types carry risks of general bias. However, treatment validity is an essential condition for the pragmatic evaluation of any surgical efficacy. This is largely important notion in studies in regards to outcome, particularly in areas, such as nonfusion spine surgery.

To discuss it further, the choice of treatment should, nowadays, invariably be a shared decision between patient and surgeon; however, treatment options solely should be based on evidence. I believe that inclined trend of researches on the outcome will expand our knowledge exponentially and we will have increasingly useful tools and validated surgical methods to tackle complex spine disorder.

  References Top

Lee SE, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Clinical experiences of non-fusion dynamic stabilization surgery for adjacent segmental pathology after lumbar fusion. Int J Spine Surg 2016;10:8.  Back to cited text no. 1

This article has been cited by
1 Living with spinal cord injury in Mongolia: A qualitative study on perceived environmental barriers
Delgerjargal Dorjbal,Birgit Prodinger,Claudia Zanini,Baljinnyam Avirmed,Gerold Stucki,Sara Rubinelli
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded972    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal